Extensive prior litigation has shaped trader consensus around the 92% implied probability for "No." Courts at multiple levels, including federal appeals and the Supreme Court, dismissed nearly all 2020 election challenges for insufficient evidence or procedural grounds, with no successful rulings finding widespread fraud capable of altering outcomes. By late 2026, statutes of limitations, res judicata principles, and the passage of multiple election cycles create significant structural barriers to new viable cases. Traders view fresh filings as unlikely to produce the requested ruling absent extraordinary new evidence or procedural shifts, though isolated lower-court actions or appeals remain theoretically possible within narrow windows.
如果美国任何法院在 2026年12月31日 23:59 ET 前裁定,2020年美国总统选举期间至少有一个美国州发生了大规模舞弊、欺诈行为或非法操纵选票,则本市场结算为“是”。否则,此市场将判定为“否”。 裁定是指相关法院发布的任何书面命令、判决、意见或决定,包括 per curiam 意见、简易命令以及依职权作出的裁定。未以书面形式记录的口头裁定、临时裁定、和解、要求说明理由的命令,或其他不构成最终裁定的程序,均不予计入。 符合条件的舞弊裁定必须认定,2020年美国总统选举期间发生了大规模且蓄意的选民舞弊或选票操纵。程序违规、行政错误,或针对个别选民舞弊案件的零星裁定,均不予计入。 主要结算依据为相关法院的官方信息;但也可以采用可信报道形成的共识。
机器翻译。如有争议,以原文为准。