The tight clustering of implied probabilities among Clarence Thomas, Howard Lutnick, and Pete Hegseth reflects trader focus on multiple federal officials facing sustained congressional scrutiny over ethics, confirmation-related conduct, and executive-branch performance. Thomas draws attention from prior ethics inquiries and Supreme Court impeachment resolutions, while Lutnick and Hegseth face monitoring tied to their cabinet roles and any emerging oversight hearings or allegations. With no single dominant catalyst in recent weeks, the market prices in parallel paths for House action before the 2027 deadline, tempered by the high bar for Senate conviction. Developments such as new investigative findings, committee votes, or shifts in House majority dynamics could widen gaps, whereas absence of formal articles keeps the field compressed and elevates the "nobody" outcome.
本市場將根據所列人士中,誰最先成為美國眾議院於市場建立至2027年12月31日 下午11:59 ET期間通過彈劾條款的對象來結算。針對本市場未列出的任何人士通過的彈劾條款,均不予考慮。 如果同時通過針對多位所列人士的彈劾條款,本市場將結算給其中遭通過彈劾條款的所列人士,而其姓氏按字母順序排列最先者。 如果截至2027年12月31日 下午11:59 ET,美國眾議院尚未彈劾任何一位所列人士,本市場將結算為「無人」。 本市場結算為「是」不需要經過美國參議院審判或定罪,也不需要將當事人免職。 本市場的主要結算來源為美國聯邦政府資訊,但也可採用可信報導所形成的共識。
機器翻譯。如有爭議,以原文為準。