Team Liquid enters the PARI Universe 2026 Playoffs lower-bracket quarterfinal against OG with a strong historical series edge, leading head-to-head matchups 6-2 overall despite OG’s 2-1 group-stage victory on October 25. Liquid’s roster, featuring miCKe, Malr1ne, Wisper, Boxi, and tOfu, has shown flashes of form with a 2-0 win over Astra Invicta on October 29 but suffered a 1-2 loss to PARIVISION the prior day. OG, bolstered by Topson’s mid-lane return alongside Natsumi, SSS, OneJey, and skem, carries momentum from a 2-1 upset over Team Spirit yet fell 0-2 to GamerLegion in the playoffs on October 29. The best-of-three format in this double-elimination setting amplifies the impact of recent map execution and draft adaptability for both sides.
This market refers to the Dota 2 Lower Bracket Quarterfinal 1 match between Team Liquid and OG in the PARI Universe Playoffs, initially scheduled for October 30, 2026 at 9:00 AM ET. This market will resolve to "Team Liquid" if Team Liquid win Game 1 against OG. This market will resolve to "OG" if OG win Game 1 against Team Liquid. If the match begins but is not completed, and Game 1 is concluded with a winner determined, this market will resolve based on the completed Game 1. If Game 1 is not completed for any reason, this market will resolve 50-50. If the match is canceled (not played at all), this market will resolve 50-50. If the match is postponed, it must be rescheduled to a start time on or before November 13, 2026 at 11:59 PM ET (14 calendar days after the originally scheduled start of October 30, 2026 at 9:00 AM ET). If, by that deadline, the most recently announced rescheduled start time is on or before the deadline, this market resolves based on the result of the match as played. Otherwise, this market resolves 50-50, regardless of whether the match is subsequently played. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://www.dotabuff.com. However, if https://www.dotabuff.com has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence.