- Mayo vs. Forbes: Match O/U 21.5100¢
- Set 1 Winner: Mayo vs Forbes100¢
- Aidan Mayo vs. Matthew Forbes: Total Sets O/U 2.50¢
- Kingston 2: Aidan Mayo vs Matthew Forbes100¢
- Kingston 2: Completed Match: Aidan Mayo vs Matthew Forbes100¢
- Set 2 Winner: Mayo vs Forbes100¢
- Mayo vs. Forbes: Set 1 Games O/U 8.5100¢
- Mayo vs. Forbes: Set 1 Games O/U 9.5100¢
- Mayo vs. Forbes: Set 2 Games O/U 9.5100¢
- Mayo vs. Forbes: Match O/U 23.5100¢
- Mayo vs. Forbes: Set 2 Games O/U 8.5100¢
- Mayo vs. Forbes: Match O/U 22.5100¢
This market refers to the tennis match between Aidan Mayo and Matthew Forbes in the Kingston 2, originally scheduled for August 25, 2026 at 2:00PM ET. This market will resolve to 'Aidan Mayo' if Aidan Mayo advances against Matthew Forbes. This market will resolve to 'Matthew Forbes' if Matthew Forbes advances against Aidan Mayo. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or a winner has not been determined by September 8, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Aidan Mayo enters this ATP Challenger Kingston 2 first-round match on hard courts as the clear favorite, holding a ranking near 580-625 compared to Matthew Forbes at approximately 741. Mayo has shown solid recent form in the Kingston series, advancing through qualifying and posting straight-set wins in prior rounds, while Forbes, a former Michigan State standout who reached his career-high ranking in July 2026, brings collegiate momentum but limited pro experience. Their limited prior head-to-head history and the surface favor Mayo’s baseline consistency, though Forbes’s recent ranking climb and potential upset power in a low-stakes opener keep the contest competitive for traders assessing implied probabilities.