Rinky Hijikata and Yannick Hanfmann meet in the second round of qualifying at the 2026 Swiss Indoors Basel on indoor hard courts. Hanfmann, ranked No. 59 with a career high of 45, enters with a recent qualifying win over Marcos Giron (6-2, 5-7, 6-4) after a first-round loss in Brussels. Hijikata, ranked No. 86, has shown mixed hard-court results across recent events in Almaty, Shanghai, Tokyo, and Hangzhou, including a loss in Basel qualifying. The pair’s only prior meeting came at the 2023 Australian Open, where Hijikata prevailed in five sets. Hanfmann’s greater experience and physical reach contrast with Hijikata’s competitive recent form on the surface, while both players navigate the demands of a short turnaround in the qualifying draw.
This market refers to the tennis match between Rinky Hijikata and Yannick Hanfmann in the Swiss Indoors Basel, Qualification, originally scheduled for October 25, 2026 at 7:00AM ET. This market will resolve to "Over" if the total number of games completed equals or exceeds 22. Otherwise, it will resolve to "Under." All tiebreaks, including any Champions/Super tiebreak, count as one (1) game. If the match is postponed or suspended, this market will remain open until the match has been completed. A postponement alone will not trigger a 50-50 resolution. If the match is permanently abandoned before completion, or if the match has not been completed by November 8, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve 50-50, unless the outcome has already been unconditionally determined based on completed play. An outcome is considered unconditionally determined if it would have been guaranteed under every possible completion of the match played according to the match format published by the tournament organizer for that round, including whether a final set is played as a full set or as a match tiebreak. For example, for a line of 21.5, if play stops at 6-3, 5-6, completing the match would have required at least 2 additional games, resulting in at least 22 games played, so "Over" would resolve as the winning outcome. Likewise, if the published format replaces the final set with a match tiebreak, that tiebreak counts as one (1) game, so for a line of 22.5, if play stops at 6-2, 3-3, the match could have reached at most 22 games and "Under" would resolve as the winning outcome. The primary resolution source for this market will be official ATP statistics; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.