- 9月7日阿姆斯特丹的最高氣溫會是19°C或以下嗎？<1¢
- 阿姆斯特丹9月7日的最高氣溫會是20°C嗎？<1¢
- 9月7日阿姆斯特丹的最高氣溫會是21°C嗎？<1¢
- 9月7日阿姆斯特丹的最高氣溫會是22°C嗎？1¢
- 9月7日阿姆斯特丹的最高氣溫會是23°C嗎？3¢
- 9月7日阿姆斯特丹的最高氣溫會是24°C嗎？9¢
- 9月7日阿姆斯特丹的最高氣溫會達到25°C嗎？39¢
- 阿姆斯特丹在9月7日的最高氣溫會是26°C嗎？45¢
- 9月7日阿姆斯特丹的最高氣溫會是27°C嗎？7¢
- 9月7日阿姆斯特丹的最高氣溫會是28°C嗎？1¢
- 9月7日阿姆斯特丹的最高氣溫會達到29°C或以上嗎？<1¢
This market will resolve to the temperature range that contains the highest temperature recorded by NOAA at the Amsterdam Airport Schiphol Station in degrees Celsius on 7 Sep '26. The resolution source for this market will be information from NOAA, specifically the highest reading under the "Temp" column for all times on this day, available here: https://www.weather.gov/wrh/timeseries?site=eham If NOAA data for the observation date is unavailable by 11:59 PM ET on the day following the observation date, the Weather Underground Daily Observations table will be used as the resolution source. In the event that there is no data for the observation date by 11:59 PM ET on the day following the observation date, this market will resolve to the lowest bracket. To toggle between Fahrenheit and Celsius, click the "Switch to Metric Units" button until the relevant table displays °C. This market will resolve once the first data point for the following date has been published on the resolution source, or by 11:59 PM ET on the day following the observation date, whichever comes first. The resolution source for this market measures temperatures to whole degrees Celsius (eg, 9°C). Thus, this is the level of precision that will be used when resolving the market. Revisions to temperatures recorded within this market's timeframe will be considered until the first datapoint for the following date has been published, after which any alterations will not be considered.
Latest ensemble forecasts from major models indicate southerly flow advecting milder air across the Netherlands ahead of an approaching front, with partly cloudy skies expected to permit sufficient insolation for a daily maximum near 25–26 °C in Amsterdam on September 7. Subtle differences between the leading outcomes stem from variations in predicted cloud timing, boundary-layer mixing, and local wind speeds, which can shift the precise peak by 1 °C. Trader consensus, reflected in the tight 44.5 %–37.5 % split, captures this narrow uncertainty range while assigning low probability to 27 °C or higher, consistent with the absence of stronger warm-air advection or clear-sky conditions in current guidance. Updated model runs and official briefings later today will refine the exact threshold.