- Schoenhaus vs. Dodig: Set 2 Games O/U 8.5100¢
- Schoenhaus vs. Dodig: Set 2 Games O/U 9.5100¢
- Set 2 Winner: Schoenhaus vs Dodig0¢
- Schoenhaus vs. Dodig: Match O/U 22.5100¢
- Schoenhaus vs. Dodig: Set 1 Games O/U 9.50¢
- Como: Max Schoenhaus vs Matej Dodig0¢
- Como: Completed Match: Max Schoenhaus vs Matej Dodig100¢
- Set 1 Winner: Schoenhaus vs Dodig100¢
- Set Handicap: Dodig (-1.5) vs Schoenhaus (+1.5)0¢
- Max Schoenhaus vs. Matej Dodig: Total Sets O/U 2.5100¢
- Set Handicap: Schoenhaus (-1.5) vs Dodig (+1.5)0¢
- Schoenhaus vs. Dodig: Match O/U 23.5100¢
This market refers to the tennis match between Max Schoenhaus and Matej Dodig in the Como, originally scheduled for September 4, 2026 at 4:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Max Schoenhaus' if Max Schoenhaus advances against Matej Dodig. This market will resolve to 'Matej Dodig' if Matej Dodig advances against Max Schoenhaus. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or a winner has not been determined by September 18, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Matej Dodig holds a modest edge in this Como Challenger quarterfinal on clay, reflecting his higher ATP ranking of 254 against Max Schoenhaus’s 318 and stronger recent results at the level. The 21-year-old Croatian has compiled an 8-2 stretch entering the match, including straight-sets wins over Poljičak and a three-set victory against Bernet in the prior rounds. Schoenhaus, the 19-year-old German, carries momentum from back-to-back wins over Guillen Meza and Bueno but trails in overall experience on the Challenger circuit. No prior head-to-head exists, and both players favor clay, making recent form, physical freshness after multiple three-setters, and serve-return efficiency the primary variables traders are weighing.