- क्या डोनाल्ड ट्रम्प 30 सितंबर, 2026 तक टकर कार्लसन का सार्वजनिक रूप से अपमान करेंगे?66¢
- क्या डोनाल्ड ट्रंप 30 सितंबर, 2026 तक मेगिन केली का सार्वजनिक रूप से अपमान करेंगे?16¢
- क्या डोनाल्ड ट्रंप 30 सितंबर, 2026 तक सार्वजनिक रूप से कैंडेस ओवेन्स का अपमान करेंगे?35¢
- क्या डोनाल्ड ट्रंप 30 सितंबर, 2026 तक सार्वजनिक रूप से एलेक्स जोन्स का अपमान करेंगे?14¢
- क्या डोनाल्ड ट्रंप 30 सितंबर, 2026 तक सार्वजनिक रूप से पोप लियो चौदहवें का अपमान करेंगे?12¢
- क्या डोनाल्ड ट्रंप 30 सितंबर, 2026 तक व्लादिमीर पुतिन का सार्वजनिक रूप से अपमान करेंगे?18¢
- क्या डोनाल्ड ट्रंप 30 सितंबर, 2026 तक सार्वजनिक रूप से बराक ओबामा का अपमान करेंगे?94¢
- क्या डोनाल्ड ट्रम्प 30 सितंबर, 2026 तक सार्वजनिक रूप से मार्जरी टेलर ग्रीन का अपमान करेंगे?60¢
- क्या डोनाल्ड ट्रम्प 30 सितंबर, 2026 तक पाम बोंडी का सार्वजनिक अपमान करेंगे?6¢
- क्या डोनाल्ड ट्रंप 30 सितंबर, 2026 तक सार्वजनिक रूप से बेंजामिन नेतन्याहू का अपमान करेंगे?26¢
- क्या डोनाल्ड ट्रम्प 30 सितंबर, 2026 तक सार्वजनिक रूप से जे.डी. वेंस का अपमान करेंगे?6¢
- क्या डोनाल्ड ट्रम्प 30 सितंबर, 2026 तक मेलानिया ट्रम्प का सार्वजनिक रूप से अपमान करेंगे?2¢
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify. Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify. A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify. A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare"). A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject. The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Trump has continued his pattern of public criticism through Truth Social posts and speeches, most recently targeting media outlets and journalists over coverage of U.S. actions in the Middle East conflict with Iran. In early September 2026, he labeled ABC News reporting as “Fake News” and described Iran as a “Failed Nation” that is “DEAD,” while threatening further strikes. Late August posts singled out New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman with personal attacks. These statements align with earlier 2026 episodes at events like the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, where he directed remarks at specific journalists and political figures. With the September 30 resolution window open, trader focus centers on whether ongoing Iran-related developments, media scrutiny, or domestic policy disputes prompt additional named targets before the deadline.