- Total Kills Over/Under 27.5 in Game 4?50¢
- First Blood in Game 5?51¢
- Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 5?50¢
- Game 1: Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors?28¢
- Game 1: Any Player Penta Kill?25¢
- Game 1: Odd/Even Total Kills?50¢
- Game 2: Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor?28¢
- Game 2: Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors?28¢
- LoL: Ninjas in Pyjamas vs LGD Gaming - Game 1 Winner59¢
- LoL: Ninjas in Pyjamas vs LGD Gaming - Game 2 Winner59¢
- LoL: Ninjas in Pyjamas vs LGD Gaming - Game 3 Winner57¢
- LoL: Ninjas in Pyjamas vs LGD Gaming - Game 4 Winner54¢
This market refers to the LoL Lower bracket quarterfinal 2 match between Ninjas in Pyjamas and LGD Gaming in the LPL Playoffs, initially scheduled for September 6, 2026 at 5:00 AM ET. This market will resolve to "Ninjas in Pyjamas" if Ninjas in Pyjamas win the match against LGD Gaming. This market will resolve to "LGD Gaming" if LGD Gaming win the match against Ninjas in Pyjamas. If the match is canceled (not played at all) or ends in a tie, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match is postponed, it must be rescheduled to a start time on or before September 20, 2026 at 11:59 PM ET (14 calendar days after the originally scheduled start of September 6, 2026 at 5:00 AM ET). If, by that deadline, the most recently announced rescheduled start time is on or before the deadline, this market resolves based on the result of the match as played. Otherwise, this market resolves 50-50, regardless of whether the match is subsequently played. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins. If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://gol.gg/esports/home. However, if https://gol.gg/esports/home has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence. In cases where a team’s listed name includes minor discrepancies from the resolution source, this market will resolve based on the underlying real-world match rather than exact name matching. Recognizable abbreviations, alternate or erroneous spellings, sponsor tags, affiliate or academy designations, regional identifiers, and minor formatting differences will be treated as referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition. If a listed team name has no reasonable connection to any participating team, or if it matches or could reasonably refer to another team in the same competition such that the intended team cannot be unambiguously determined, this market will resolve 50-50.
NIP enters the LPL Split 3 lower-bracket quarterfinals with strong recent momentum after sweeping JDG 3-0 on September 5, showcasing dominant early-game aggression and teamfight execution led by HOYA’s carry performances on Olaf and Varus alongside Photic’s consistent ADC output. LGD dropped into the matchup following a 1-3 loss to Anyone’s Legend on September 4-5, where they secured an early series lead before AL’s adjustments produced a comeback. NIP’s undefeated run through recent lower-bracket games and superior form in high-stakes BO5s contrast with LGD’s inconsistent playoff results and mid-table regular-season standing. Key variables include side selection, patch-specific meta picks, and whether LGD can stabilize their early game against NIP’s aggressive drafting and objective control. Trader consensus reflects NIP’s current edge in form and bracket positioning.