- Faurel vs. Hemery: Match O/U 23.5100¢
- Set 2 Winner: Faurel vs Hemery0¢
- Set Handicap: Hemery (-1.5) vs Faurel (+1.5)0¢
- Faurel vs. Hemery: Set 1 Games O/U 10.5100¢
- Faurel vs. Hemery: Set 2 Games O/U 8.5100¢
- Faurel vs. Hemery: Match O/U 22.5100¢
- Set 1 Winner: Faurel vs Hemery100¢
- Faurel vs. Hemery: Match O/U 21.5100¢
- Faurel vs. Hemery: Set 1 Games O/U 9.5100¢
- Faurel vs. Hemery: Set 2 Games O/U 10.5100¢
- Set Handicap: Faurel (-1.5) vs Hemery (+1.5)0¢
- Plovdiv 3: Thomas Faurel vs Calvin Hemery100¢
This market refers to the tennis match between Thomas Faurel and Calvin Hemery in the Plovdiv 3, originally scheduled for September 2, 2026 at 3:30AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Thomas Faurel' if Thomas Faurel advances against Calvin Hemery. This market will resolve to 'Calvin Hemery' if Calvin Hemery advances against Thomas Faurel. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or a winner has not been determined by September 16, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Thomas Faurel and Calvin Hemery met in the round of 16 of the 2026 Plovdiv 3 Challenger on outdoor clay, with both players advancing from the round of 32 the prior day. Faurel, the 20-year-old ranked No. 351, defeated qualifier Giorgio Tabacco 7-5, 7-5 after earlier clay results that included a mix of wins and losses on the surface. Hemery, the 31-year-old No. 6 seed ranked No. 328, overcame Eric Vanshelboim 3-6, 6-0, 6-2 and brought greater experience plus a career-high ranking of No. 116, though his recent form showed inconsistency. The pair had no prior head-to-head meetings. Close rankings produced near-even pre-match implied probabilities, with Hemery holding a modest edge in some markets around 51-58% due to seeding and serve/return metrics on clay. The red-clay conditions and round-of-16 scheduling on Court 1 framed a competitive matchup where recent match play and physical condition were primary variables for traders.