- Jade vs. Jadoun: Match O/U 21.5100¢
- Set 2 Winner: Jade vs Jadoun0¢
- Jade vs. Jadoun: Set 1 Games O/U 8.5100¢
- Set 1 Winner: Jade vs Jadoun100¢
- Jade vs. Jadoun: Match O/U 22.5100¢
- Jade vs. Jadoun: Set 2 Games O/U 10.50¢
- Jade vs. Jadoun: Set 1 Games O/U 9.50¢
- Jade vs. Jadoun: Set 1 Games O/U 10.50¢
- ITF MEN - SINGLES: M15 Monastir 28 (Tunisia), hard: Daniel Jade vs Nicolas Jadoun0¢
- Jade vs. Jadoun: Set 2 Games O/U 9.50¢
- Jade vs. Jadoun: Set 2 Games O/U 8.50¢
- Set Handicap: Jadoun (-1.5) vs Jade (+1.5)0¢
This market refers to the tennis match between Daniel Jade and Nicolas Jadoun in the ITF MEN - SINGLES: M15 Monastir 28 (Tunisia), hard, originally scheduled for August 30, 2026 at 3:30AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Daniel Jade' if Daniel Jade advances against Nicolas Jadoun. This market will resolve to 'Nicolas Jadoun' if Nicolas Jadoun advances against Daniel Jade. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or a winner has not been determined by September 13, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Daniel Jade holds the edge in this M15 Monastir 28 final on hard courts, backed by a stronger 2026 ITF-level record (around 72% win rate) and higher ranking trajectory near the top 700 versus Jadoun’s mid-800s standing. The 17-year-old Frenchman arrives after a dominant run that includes straight-set victories over Dhokia, Abibsi, and Jones, plus resilience in earlier clay events. Jadoun, 24, counters with solid hard-court experience and four consecutive wins in the draw, including a semifinal retirement victory, though his overall results show more inconsistency. No prior head-to-head exists, making recent tournament form and surface adaptation the primary drivers of trader consensus on implied probabilities.