- Pol Martin Tiffon vs. Tom Gentzsch: Total Sets O/U 2.539¢
- Tiffon vs. Gentzsch: Match O/U 23.543¢
- Set 2 Winner: Tiffon vs Gentzsch40¢
- Tiffon vs. Gentzsch: Match O/U 21.556¢
- Tiffon vs. Gentzsch: Set 1 Games O/U 8.554¢
- Tiffon vs. Gentzsch: Set 2 Games O/U 9.550¢
- Set 1 Winner: Tiffon vs Gentzsch41¢
- Tiffon vs. Gentzsch: Set 2 Games O/U 10.550¢
- Tiffon vs. Gentzsch: Set 1 Games O/U 10.536¢
- Tiffon vs. Gentzsch: Set 2 Games O/U 8.550¢
- Game Spread: Gentzsch (-2.5) vs Tiffon (+2.5)32¢
- Set Handicap: Gentzsch (-1.5) vs Tiffon (+1.5)43¢
This market refers to the tennis match between Pol Martin Tiffon and Tom Gentzsch in the US Open, Qualification ATP, originally scheduled for August 24, 2026 at 3:30PM ET. This market will resolve to 'Pol Martin Tiffon' if Pol Martin Tiffon advances against Tom Gentzsch. This market will resolve to 'Tom Gentzsch' if Tom Gentzsch advances against Pol Martin Tiffon. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or a winner has not been determined by September 7, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Tom Gentzsch enters this US Open qualifying first-round match on hard courts holding the clear ranking edge at No. 145 after reaching a career high in mid-August 2026, while Pol Martin Tiffon sits at No. 209. The 22-year-old German has shown stronger recent momentum through Challenger-level results and consistent hard-court play, contrasting with Tiffon’s 27-year-old profile marked by limited 2026 wins and a retirement in July’s Umag qualifying. No prior head-to-head exists, but Gentzsch’s higher ranking, youth, and surface suitability underpin trader consensus favoring him as the implied probability leader in this best-of-three encounter. Outdoor conditions and potential fatigue from the qualifying schedule remain secondary variables that could influence later rounds if either advances.