Roehampton: Anton Shepp vs Mark Ceban
- Set Handicap: Shepp (-1.5) vs Ceban (+1.5)41¢
- Shepp vs. Ceban: Set 2 Games O/U 9.550¢
- Shepp vs. Ceban: Set 1 Games O/U 8.576¢
- Shepp vs. Ceban: Set 1 Games O/U 10.529¢
- Set 2 Winner: Shepp vs Ceban56¢
- Set 1 Winner: Shepp vs Ceban56¢
- Shepp vs. Ceban: Match O/U 22.547¢
- Roehampton: Anton Shepp vs Mark Ceban61¢
- Roehampton: Completed Match: Anton Shepp vs Mark Ceban50¢
- Set Handicap: Ceban (-1.5) vs Shepp (+1.5)25¢
- Shepp vs. Ceban: Set 2 Games O/U 8.550¢
- Shepp vs. Ceban: Set 1 Games O/U 9.540¢
This market refers to the tennis match between Anton Shepp and Mark Ceban in the Roehampton, originally scheduled for August 17, 2026 at 5:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Anton Shepp' if Anton Shepp advances against Mark Ceban. This market will resolve to 'Mark Ceban' if Mark Ceban advances against Anton Shepp. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Anton Shepp holds a substantial experience and ranking edge over 17-year-old Briton Mark Ceban in their first-round Roehampton Challenger encounter on hard courts. The 23-year-old New Zealander, ranked in the low 400s after a mixed North American swing and an ITF title win in late 2025, faces a player still primarily competing at ITF and junior levels with a ranking near 2100. Ceban’s recent activity in local M25 events and strong junior pedigree provide some momentum and home-soil familiarity near London, yet the significant gap in professional match volume and consistency favors Shepp’s established baseline game. No prior head-to-head exists, leaving form, physical conditioning, and adaptation to Challenger intensity as the decisive variables.