- Roehampton 2: Max Basing vs Charles Broom0¢
- Basing vs. Broom: Set 1 Games O/U 8.5100¢
- Basing vs. Broom: Set 2 Games O/U 9.50¢
- Basing vs. Broom: Match O/U 23.50¢
- Set 2 Winner: Basing vs Broom0¢
- Set Handicap: Basing (-1.5) vs Broom (+1.5)0¢
- Basing vs. Broom: Match O/U 22.50¢
- Set Handicap: Broom (-1.5) vs Basing (+1.5)100¢
- Roehampton 2: Completed Match: Max Basing vs Charles Broom100¢
- Set 1 Winner: Basing vs Broom0¢
- Basing vs. Broom: Set 2 Games O/U 8.50¢
- Basing vs. Broom: Set 1 Games O/U 10.50¢
This market refers to the tennis match between Max Basing and Charles Broom in the Roehampton 2, originally scheduled for August 27, 2026 at 7:30AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Max Basing' if Max Basing advances against Charles Broom. This market will resolve to 'Charles Broom' if Charles Broom advances against Max Basing. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or a winner has not been determined by September 10, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Charles Broom enters the Roehampton 2 Challenger quarterfinal on hard courts with stronger recent momentum, winning nine of his last ten matches in straight sets while advancing through the draw. The 28-year-old Briton, ranked around 258-289 and seeded sixth, brings more established Challenger experience than 23-year-old Max Basing despite similar world rankings near 248-266. Basing, the top seed, posted solid wins over Deckers and Langmo but has compiled most of his success at lower ITF levels. Serve and return metrics show minimal separation, with Basing slightly more effective on returns and Broom holding up better on break points saved; the pair has no recent head-to-head history. Trader pricing reflects a near-even contest shaped by Broom’s current form edge and the home-soil Challenger setting.